Re: range_agg extremely slow compared to naive implementation in obscure circumstances
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com>,
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-02-01T14:51:11Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2023-Jan-31, David Rowley wrote: >> It might be better if we had multirange_canonicalize() deserialize >> these once and used some representation that could more easily be >> qsorted. I'm not planning on doing any work on it though. > Yeah, maybe it would be possible to have an in-memory representation > that doesn't require any deparsing, and keep the compact representation > to be used only for in-data-page storage. How to do this within the > constraints of the Datum abstraction is not clear to me. Perhaps the "expanded datum" mechanism would serve? src/include/utils/expandeddatum.h It might be too heavyweight for this application, but I'm not sure. regards, tom lane