Thread

1. Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]

   Maurice Gittens <mgittens@gits.nl> — 1998-05-11T15:18:38Z

   
   >dg@illustra.com (David Gould) writes:
   >> The idea that occurred to me is to have the postmaster
   >> "pre-spawn" some servers in each (configurable) database. These would run
   >> all the initialization and then just wait for a socket to be handed to
   them.
   >> The postmaster would during idle time replenish the pool of ready
   servers.
   >
   
   Doesn't Apache do something similar? It should be easy enough to borrow
   their
   implementation.
   
   Regards,
       Maurice.
   
   
   
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]

   Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org> — 1998-05-11T15:37:08Z

   They do it by having all children perform a "listen" on the socket..
   would the ipc stuff function as usual in this case?  I'm not clear on
   how the ipc stuff works.
   
   On Mon, 11 May 1998, at 17:18:38, Maurice Gittens wrote:
   
   > Doesn't Apache do something similar? It should be easy enough to borrow
   > their
   > implementation.
   > 
   > Regards,
   >     Maurice.
   > 
   > 
   >