Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-11-17T06:19:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > pg_temp-toindex.patch > Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs. But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_NNNN something. How should that be indexed?