Re: WIP checksums patch
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Date: 2012-10-01T16:25:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 10:43 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > The default is <literal>off</> for backwards compatibility and > > to allow upgrade. The recommended setting is <literal>on</> though > > this should not be enabled until upgrade is successfully complete > > with full set of new backups. > > > > I don't understand what that means -- if they have the page_checksums > > GUC available, then surely upgrade is complete, right? And what is the > > backwards-compatibility issue? > I think this need to clearly state "pg_upgrade", not a dump/restore > upgrade, which would be fine. It would be interesting to have > pg_upgrade change this setting, or tell the user to change it. I am not > sure enough people are using pg_upgrade to change a default value. I still don't understand why pg_upgrade and page_checksums don't mix. Regards, Jeff Davis