Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-05-27T21:49:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
aio: Stop using enum bitfields due to bad code generation
- ce161b194e84 18.0 landed
- 5865150b6d53 19 (unreleased) landed
-
amcheck: Fix posting tree checks in gin_index_check()
- 0cf205e122ae 18.0 cited
-
aio: Add missing memory barrier when waiting for IO handle
- e9a3615a5224 18.0 landed
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > I'll see if being graphically logged in somehow indeed increased the repro > rate, and if so I'll expand the debugging somewhat, or if this was just an > absurd coincidence. Hmm. Now that you mention it, the one repro on the M1 came just as I was about to give up and manually cancel the script that was running the 027 test in a loop. I wondered for a moment if I'd somehow affected the state of the machine, but since I was logged in over ssh I didn't quite see how that would be possible. But your tale makes me suspect that outside activity helps --- which would square with Alexander's results that suggest concurrent runs help. regards, tom lane