Re: splitting htup.h
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2012-08-29T19:13:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- tupbasics-4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch
Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of mié ago 29 12:10:17 -0400 2012: > > OK, scratch that thought then. So we seem to be down to choosing a new > > name for what we're going to take out of htup.h. If you don't like > > heap.h, maybe something like heap_tuple.h? I'm not terribly excited > > about it either way though. Any other ideas out there? > htup_details.h? That doesn't have the sound of "fringe details" that > htup_private.h has. htup_details.h seems reasonable, thanks. Here's the proposed patch (which uses tupheader.h instead of htup_details.h but other than that it's pretty much what I would commit). -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services