Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-21T05:18:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> writes: > I found an explicit UNION ALL has higher cost than an automatic expansion > by inheritance (49 vs. 83 in the example below). Where does the difference > come from? The plan for UNION initially involves a couple of SubqueryScan nodes, which impose an extra cost of cpu_tuple_cost per tuple. Those later get optimized away, but we don't try to readjust the cost estimates for that. regards, tom lane