Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-08-07T14:38:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie ago 03 16:02:28 -0400 2012: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I > > >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all. Are we > > >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin? That seems a > > >> strange policy. > > > > > > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then. > > > > I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of > > robustness that I'm not sanguine about. Granted, putting it in > > contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than > > is perhaps warranted. But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in > > src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to > > filing down the rough edges. > > I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges. So do you have a list of rough edges? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services