Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@2ndquadrant.it>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Gianni Ciolli <gianni.ciolli@2ndquadrant.it>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Date: 2012-07-30T17:11:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow LEAKPROOF functions for better performance of security views.
- cd30728fb2ed 9.2.0 cited
-
Improve labeling of pg_test_fsync open_sync test output.
- 2bbd88f8f841 9.2.0 cited
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of lun jul 30 11:21:46 -0400 2012: > On 30 July 2012 16:12, Gabriele Bartolini > <gabriele.bartolini@2ndquadrant.it> wrote: > > > * Array Foreign Key > > * Foreign Key Arrays > > * ELEMENT Foreign Keys > > * ... > > > > Which one is your favourite? > > Array Element Foreign Key I was going to say the same, except I had ELEMENT as a capitalized word in my mind (and in the docs it'd be within <literal>). -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support