Re: [PATCH] Optimize IS DISTINCT FROM NULL => IS NOT NULL
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-08T17:35:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> writes: > This patch enables a simple optimization in > eval_const_expressions_mutator. If we know that one argument to > DistinctExpr is NULL then we can optimize it to a NullTest, which can > be an indexable expression. Uh ... how much do we care about that? I can't say that I've heard many people complain about the fact that IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM is poorly optimized -- which it is, in general, and this patch chips away at that only a tiny bit, not enough to make it recommendable. If we really wanted to make that a first-class operation we would need far more work than this. Plus I don't see why anyone would write the specific case "IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL" when they could write half as much. regards, tom lane