Re: Virtual generated columns
Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Expand virtual generated columns for ALTER COLUMN TYPE
- 5069fef1cfae 18.0 landed
-
Eliminate code duplication in replace_rte_variables callbacks
- 363a6e8c6fcf 18.0 landed
-
Expand virtual generated columns in the planner
- 1e4351af329f 18.0 landed
-
Virtual generated columns
- 83ea6c54025b 18.0 landed
-
Additional tests for stored generated columns
- 41084409f635 18.0 landed
-
Improve generated_stored test
- 44b61efb7928 18.0 landed
- 86749ea3b766 18.0 landed
-
Fix handling of CREATE DOMAIN with GENERATED constraint syntax
- 84a67725cd11 18.0 landed
-
Add pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints
- 14e87ffa5c54 18.0 cited
-
Put generated_stored test objects in a schema
- 894be11adfa6 18.0 landed
-
Rename regress test generated to generated_stored
- b9ed4969250d 18.0 landed
-
Small code simplification
- 7ff9afbbd1df 18.0 landed
-
Remove useless code
- e26d313bad92 18.0 landed
-
Remove useless initializations
- da2aeba8f533 18.0 landed
-
doc: Clarify that pg_attrdef also stores generation expressions
- da486d360103 18.0 landed
-
Clean out column-level pg_init_privs entries when dropping tables.
- 76618097a6c0 17.0 cited
-
Re-implement the ereport() macro using __VA_ARGS__.
- e3a87b4991cc 13.0 cited
On Feb 10, 2025 at 12:53 +0800, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, wrote: > > please check attached. > > > BTW, I was curious about what happens if the replacement expression is > > constant, so I tried running the query below. > > > > CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (1 + 1)); > > INSERT INTO t VALUES (1); > > INSERT INTO t VALUES (2); > > > > # SELECT t2.a, t2.b FROM t t1 LEFT JOIN t t2 ON FALSE; > > a | b > > ---+--- > > | 2 > > | 2 > > (2 rows) > > > > Is this the expected behavior? I was expecting that t2.b should be > > all NULLs. > > > SELECT t2.a, t2.b FROM t t1 LEFT JOIN t t2 ON FALSE; > should be same as > SELECT t2.a, 2 as b FROM t t1 LEFT JOIN t t2 ON FALSE; > so i think this is expected. Hi, I believe virtual columns should behave like stored columns, except they don't actually use storage. Virtual columns are computed when the table is read, and they should adhere to the same rules of join semantics. I agree with Richard, the result seems incorrect. The right outcome should be: gpadmin=# SELECT t2.a, t2.b FROM t t1 LEFT JOIN t t2 ON FALSE; a | b ------+------ NULL | NULL NULL | NULL (2 rows) -- Zhang Mingli HashData