Horton

Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>, alexk <alexk@commandprompt.com>, Alexander Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-09T18:45:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Reset reindex-in-progress state before reverifying an exclusion constraint.

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi jun 08 14:28:02 -0400 2011:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> This customer is running on 8.4 so I started from there; should I
>>> backpatch this to 8.2, or not at all?

>> I'm not excited about back-patching it...

> Bummer.

Well, of course mine is only one opinion; anybody else feel this *is*
worth risking a back-patch for?

My thought is that it needs some beta testing.  Perhaps it'd be sane to
push it into beta2 now, and then back-patch sometime after 9.1 final,
if no problems pop up.

			regards, tom lane