Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-25T03:30:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> writes: > Grabbing bigger chunks is always optimal, AFICT, if they're not > *too* big and you use the data. A single 64K read takes very little > longer than a single 8K read. Proof? regards, tom lane