Horton

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2009-01-29T18:25:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:18 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
> 
> Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that 
> using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to 
> support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that.

I am not sure I agree with this.

Someone submits patch
 ticket is created
 reviewer takes ticket
 comments
submitter takes ticket
 fixes based on comments
review takes ticket
 approves
if reviewer is a committers, he commits.
if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to "need final review"
tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters.

Sounds like standard stuff to me.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> --Josh
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997