Re: 8.4 release planning

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-01-27T15:34:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 06:40 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> > 8.4-stable
> > 8.4-experimental
> >
> > stable is everything that stable is. PostgreSQL at its best.
> >
> 
> I dislike this idea - it's same like short processed 8.5 - 

Actually it isn't because we wouldn't accept features into
8.4-experimental. The only thing we would accept into 8.4-experimental
would be bug fixes that would automatically be ported up to 8.5 (or
perhaps the other way around). We would still continue to build 8.5 as
normal. 

> that is
> more simple.

We have tried the short release cycle before, it was called 8.2. It
fails, remarkably.

> 
> regards
> Pavel Stehule
> 

Well like I said, its just an idea :)

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997