Re: 8.4 release planning
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-01-27T15:34:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 06:40 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > 8.4-stable > > 8.4-experimental > > > > stable is everything that stable is. PostgreSQL at its best. > > > > I dislike this idea - it's same like short processed 8.5 - Actually it isn't because we wouldn't accept features into 8.4-experimental. The only thing we would accept into 8.4-experimental would be bug fixes that would automatically be ported up to 8.5 (or perhaps the other way around). We would still continue to build 8.5 as normal. > that is > more simple. We have tried the short release cycle before, it was called 8.2. It fails, remarkably. > > regards > Pavel Stehule > Well like I said, its just an idea :) Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997