Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch, again
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-03-05T15:08:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> writes: > So I'm in the same pickle again. According to pg_stat_user_indexes an > index is being used all the time. However, it's only being used by > mergejoinscansel() to compare these two plans: If it's not being used otherwise, could you drop it? > I think it would be really important to have a way to turn off > get_actual_variable_range() for a specific index during runtime. Would a C > level hook be acceptable for this? You haven't really made a case for why you (or anyone else) should care. As long as the planner makes the right choice, having investigated a wrong choice doesn't seem like a bug to me. regards, tom lane