Horton

Re: advancing snapshot's xmin

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2008-03-28T14:47:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:26 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 10:35 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > 
> > > The problem is that we always consider every transaction's PGPROC->xid
> > > in calculating MyProc->xmin.  So if you have a long running
> > > transaction, it doesn't matter how far beyond the snapshots are -- the
> > > value returned by GetOldestXmin will always be at most the old
> > > transaction's Xid.  Even if that transaction cannot see the old rows
> > > because all of its snapshots are way in the future.
> > 
> > It may not have a TransactionId yet.
> 
> How is this a problen?  If it ever gets one, it will be in the future.

Yeh, that was my point. So the problem you mention mostly goes away.

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 

  PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk