Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-19T00:54:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah, now that we understand this properly I agree this is unlikely to
> bother anyone in real life.  I just want to make the build farm green.
> I wondered about ssl_max_protocol_version = 'TLSv1.2', but that GUC's
> too new.

Yeah; also, forcing that would reduce our test coverage.

> Another option would be to change the "command_fails_like"
> pattern to tolerate both errors in v11.

This might be a reasonable stopgap measure, since it'd basically
only affect buildfarm results.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

  1. Hack back-branch SSL tests to avoid intermittent buildfarm failures.

  2. Restructure libpq's handling of send failures.