Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>

From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-01-28T06:54:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:27 +1100, Russell Smith wrote:
> Can somebody explain why it's important to load with 
> synchronized_scanning off?

*Loading* with synchronized scanning off is not important (and is not
implemented by the patch).

*Dumping* with synchronized scanning off is necessary to ensure that the
order of the rows in the pg_dump matches the on-disk order of the rows
in the table, which is important if you want to preserve the clustering
of the table data on restore.

See the -hackers thread:

http://markmail.org/message/qbytsco6oj2qkxsa

-Neil