Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-01-28T06:54:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:27 +1100, Russell Smith wrote: > Can somebody explain why it's important to load with > synchronized_scanning off? *Loading* with synchronized scanning off is not important (and is not implemented by the patch). *Dumping* with synchronized scanning off is necessary to ensure that the order of the rows in the pg_dump matches the on-disk order of the rows in the table, which is important if you want to preserve the clustering of the table data on restore. See the -hackers thread: http://markmail.org/message/qbytsco6oj2qkxsa -Neil