Re: template0 database comment

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-03-12T20:10:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-03-12 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't the "postgres" database get a comment too, while we're at
> it?  Perhaps "default database to connect to"?

That's not actually true, though.  Maybe it's the "default database used
by administration programs"?  In practice it might be "some otherwise
unused database that's occasionally useful". ;-)