Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-03-07T18:45:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011: > If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for > at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point > about how the factual issues involved in a docs change ought to be > vetted on -hackers, but on the other hand the traffic on -hackers is so > high already that I'm not happy about folding another list with a > reasonably distinct charter into it. Searching for doc changes/suggestions is helped tremendously by having them in a separate list. -1 for merging it with -hackers. I have no opinion on the -hackers crossposting issue as it doesn't affect me at all. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support