Re: pl/python tracebacks
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-26T15:10:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-02-26 at 09:34 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: > ----- Original message ----- > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> > > wrote: > > > On 24/02/11 14:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Hm, perhaps, I put it in the details, because it sounded like the place > > > to put information that is not that important, but still helpful. It's > > > kind of natural to think of the traceback as the detail of the error > > > message. But if you prefer context, I'm fine with that. You want me to > > > update the patch to put the traceback in the context? > > > > I don't see a response to this question from Peter, but I read his > > email to indicate that he was hoping you'd rework along these lines. > > I can do that, but not until Monday evening. Well, I was hoping for some other opinion, but I guess my request stands.