Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-16T01:49:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add pg_describe_object function
- 6cc2deb86e91 9.1.0 cited
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > But I can read the handwriting on the wall: if I want this done right, > I'm going to have to do it myself. > > regards, tom lane Do I understand you correctly if I interpret what you would like to see is the same format used now in these cases? 1) When for btree and hash when lefttype and righttype are the same as the two function parameters. 2) When for GiST and GIN there is only one member of the operator family and the lefttype and righttype are the same as the type of the operator class that is a member of the operator family. That are the default rules in opclasscmds.c as I understood them If so I think I could try to take a stab at this and see once done if it looks like worth the additional code complexity. Regards, Andreas