Horton

Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>)

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

View thread
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>, Elliot Chance <elliotchance@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-27T20:03:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Excerpts from Peter Geoghegan's message of lun dic 27 16:13:33 -0300 2010:
> I hope that we don't make the mistake of not checking for collisions
> with C++0x keywords, for which GCC 4.3+ has partial support. The new
> standard is almost complete, so it will probably become a lot more
> relevant soon. There are quite a few new keywords in C++0x, including:
> 
> constexpr
> decltype
> nullptr
> static_assert

I think only constexpr is being currently used from this list, and it's
easily fixed because it's not exposed beyond a single file.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support