Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-24T23:46:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 18:26 -0500, Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad > > enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say, > > search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community. > > Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"... > > And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less* > ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to > keep going back to gmane's search) I think you kind of missed my point. JD -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt