Re: proposal: separate databases for contrib module testing

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 12/02/2012 10:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I always thought that was a feature not a bug.  If we give
>> each one its own DB, there will be a couple of dozen databases
>> cluttering the installation at the end of "make installcheck", and no
>> convenient way to get rid of them.

> How about if we have a make target to clean these databases out, 
> "installcheck-clean", maybe? Alternatively, or in addition, how about if 
> we have a separate make target to do things the way I'm suggesting, 
> assuming I can make that work?

Either of those would satisfy my concern.  The latter might be a bit
easier, not sure.

			regards, tom lane