Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> I think that's something that could be left for later, if not never.

> That's very great news. I'm left with moving the bulk of the code away
> from genfile.c and into postgres.c, and have the former be a user
> callable shell around the later, I suppose. Right?

Umm ... I fail to see why an extensions patch should be touching
postgres.c at all, let alone injecting a large amount of code there.
Whatever you're doing there probably requires some rethinking.

			regards, tom lane