Re: GCC vs clang
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-16T16:21:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-11-16 at 09:41 -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at > least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached > patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a > better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the > GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that > removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make > takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an > issue for another day. The underlying issue in clang has been resolved, so the next release should work out of the box. I suggest we wait for that. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5365