Horton

Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew@dunslane.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-11-10T19:49:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, we could use an optional "details" string for that.  If not, we
> are still using the magic-string approach, which I thought we didn't
> like.

No, we're not using magic strings, we're using an enum --- maybe not an
officially declared enum type, but it's a column with a predetermined
set of possible values.  It would be a magic string if it were still in
the "query" field and thus confusable with user-written queries.

			regards, tom lane