Re: Configuring synchronous replication

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-22T11:50:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:20 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > No, it's really not hierarchical. It only has goes one level deep.
> 
> I guess pgAdmin/wxWidgets are broken then :-)
> 
> [Servers]
> Count=5
> [Servers/1]
> Server=localhost

Well, by that logic, even what we have now for postgresql.conf is
hierarchical.

I think the criterion was rather meant to be

- can represent hierarchies without repeating intermediate node names

(Note: no opinion on which format is better for the task at hand)