Re: Progress indication prototype

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-16T20:57:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2010-09-16 at 15:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I reiterate my earlier criticism of this whole approach: it seems to
> assume that computing query progress is something inexpensive enough
> that we can afford to do it regardless of whether anyone is looking.

That assumption appears to hold so far.

Anyway, do you have an alternative suggestion?