Re: Progress indication prototype
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-16T20:57:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2010-09-16 at 15:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I reiterate my earlier criticism of this whole approach: it seems to > assume that computing query progress is something inexpensive enough > that we can afford to do it regardless of whether anyone is looking. That assumption appears to hold so far. Anyway, do you have an alternative suggestion?