Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset
Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
From: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>, Will Storey <will@summercat.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2025-03-26T14:54:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
В письме от среда, 26 марта 2025 г. 17:42:23 MSK пользователь Robert Haas написал: > 1. We're talking about a minor deviation resulting in a very small > amount of additional code. It's entirely unclear to me why anyone > thinks this is a big deal either way, even if one accepts that the > patch is "wrong", which I don't. This code is important part of my life for 8 years. There are not many commits, but I do code rebases all the time, I port features that have been added for all these years. I do care about it, it is big deal for me. -- Nikolay Shaplov aka Nataraj Fuzzing Engineer at Postgres Professional Matrix IM: @dhyan:nataraj.su