Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-10T14:03:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-08-10 at 17:38 +0800, Boxuan Zhai wrote: > I am not sure if inheritance of MERGE is needed by postgres. Yes, it is. > PS: for my investigation on the inheritance actions, I find that > although the children tables are modified by the UPDATE or DELETE > commands on their ancestor tables, the rules defined on them are not > activated during the query. Is this the case (I hope I am not asking a > stupid question)? And, if so, I may ask why we want it to act like > this. Your observation is correct. You could probably argue this way or that about how it should have been designed 20+ years ago, but this is how it is. In general, I wouldn't design new functionality on top of rules. Rules are pretty broken in many ways.