Horton
Menu

Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

View thread
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-06T20:48:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with
> complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one
> advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can use
> a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, I can
> use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort or
> readability for example a Perl's hash tables.

Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-)