Horton

Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: lockhart@fourpalms.org
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2001-06-05T04:21:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> On a modestly related note, I'm come over to the notion that the
> date/time value 'current' could be ripped out eventually. Tom, isn't
> that the only case for those types which bolluxes up caching of
> date/time types?

Yes, I believe so.  At least, that was the consideration that led me
to mark those functions noncachable ...

			regards, tom lane