Re: merge command - GSoC progress

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:36 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:23 +0800, Boxuan Zhai wrote:
> > Dear Robert,
> >  
> > I am just considering that there may be some logical mistakes for my
> > rule rewriting strategy of MERGE actions. 
> >  
> > In my current design, if we find that an action type, say UPDATE, is
> > replaced by INSTEAD rules, we will remove all the actions of this type
> > from the MERGE command, as if they are not be specified by user from
> > the beginning. See the test example in my pages for this situation.
> > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/MergeTestExamples#With_INSTEAD_rules
> 
> It seems sensible to use the test files that I wrote for MERGE in 2008,
> published to -hackers at that time.

Even more sensible for me to include it as a patch, with the files in
the right places and the schedules updated.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services