Re: standard_conforming_strings
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "David E.Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-07-19T21:04:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-07-18 at 09:42 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be > > in favor of doing it in the first place: Either we just flip the > > default, make a note in the release notes, and see what happens. Or we > > spend some time now and make, say, a list of driver versions and > > application versions that work with standard_conforming_strings = on, > > and then decide based on that, and also make that list a public resource > > for packagers etc. > > Do both. Turn them on, then make a list and inform driver maintainers who need to update. They've got a year, after all. Here we go then: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Standard_conforming_strings