Re: standard_conforming_strings

On ons, 2010-07-14 at 10:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
> >> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...
> >
> > "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
> > cycles on it."
> 
> Should we do this?  Patch attached.

I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be
in favor of doing it in the first place:  Either we just flip the
default, make a note in the release notes, and see what happens.  Or we
spend some time now and make, say, a list of driver versions and
application versions that work with standard_conforming_strings = on,
and then decide based on that, and also make that list a public resource
for packagers etc.