Re: Re[2]: jsonb_plperl bug
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Ivan Panchenko <wao@mail.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-08-04T18:08:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
=?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiBQYW5jaGVua28=?= <wao@mail.ru> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> The core code seems to think that SvOK() is a sufficient test for an >> undef. Should we be doing that before the switch, perhaps? > Thank you, Tom. Yes, there is a solution with SvOK(), please see the attached patch. Yeah, that looks cleaner. I suppose we could get rid of the switch() but it would result in a bigger diff for not much reason. >> (My underlying concern here is mostly about whether we have other >> similar bugs. There are a lot of places checking SvTYPE.) > I looked through plperl.c, but found no similar cases of checking SvTYPE. Yeah, at least there are no other places explicitly checking for SVt_NULL. Pushed with minor fiddling with the test case. Thanks! regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix handling of "undef" in contrib/jsonb_plperl.
- e8b639357f0a 11.5 landed
- df521ab79547 12.0 landed
- e0f5048851ff 13.0 landed