Re: deprecating =>, take two

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 21 12:20:59 -0400 2010:

> Barring vigorous objections, I will apply these tomorrow so that we
> can consider deprecating => as an operator name in 9.1, for better
> compliance with the SQL standard.

Maybe this is just a matter of semantics, but I thought we were going to
deprecate => in 9.0 so that people started to avoid its use altogether.
Why wait till 9.1 to recommend avoidance?

I had imagined that 9.1 was going to ban => altogether.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support