Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-03T19:16:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue jun 03 08:36:28 -0400 2010: > Using this only temporarily is mentioned in the doc patch. Do I need > more? Yeah, it's far too easy to miss. Besides, I think the wording you used is ambiguous -- it can be read as "the server will temporarily keep all segments if you set it to -1", which is not the same thing at all. If you can't add a 20-point-font red blinking warning with a pink dancing elephant in a tutu, maybe it's best to not offer the dangerous setting in the first place. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support