Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Date: 2010-05-18T05:26:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 12:02 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> (1) > >> Smart or fast shutdown requested in PM_STARTUP state always removes > >> the backup_label file if it exists. But it might be still required > >> for subsequent recovery. I changed your patch so that additionally > >> the postmaster skips deleting the backup_label in that case. > > > > Don't like the name NeedBackupLabel seems too specific. That really > > corresponds to "we were in recovery". We should have a couple of > > super-states that correspond to am in recovery/am not in recovery so we > > can drive it from that. > > ISTM that we can use XLogCtl->SharedRecoveryInProgress for that. > Is this OK? That can change state at any time. Would that work? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com