Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Date: 2010-05-18T05:25:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:40 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > ISTM that walreceiver might be invoked even after shutdown is > requested. We should prevent the postmaster from starting up > walreceiver if Shutdown > NoShutdown? +1 -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com