Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>

To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>

Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

Date: 2010-05-12T21:40:44Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 22:34 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 14:43 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> 
> > I thought that it
> > would be a good idea for Simon to look at it because, on the surface,
> > it APPEARS to have something to do with Hot Standby, since that's what
> > Stefan was testing when he found it.
> 
> He was also testing SR, yet you haven't breathed a word about that for
> some strange reason. It didn't APPEAR like it was HS at all, not from
> basic logic or from technical knowledge. So you'll have to forgive me if
> I don't leap into action when you say something is an HS problem in the
> future.

Simon, with respect -- knock it off. 

Robert gave a very reasonable response. He is just trying to help. Relax
man.

Joshua Drake



-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering