Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2010-05-06T14:56:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 17:39 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Not the same plugin. A hook for stop/resume would need to be called > before and/or after each record, the one for conflict resolution would > need to be called at each conflict. Designing a good interface for a > plugin is hard, you need at least a couple of samples ideas for plugins > that would use the hook, before you know the interface is flexible enough. * current behaviour of max_standby_delay * pause for X time if conflict, then cancel - which is the suggested behaviour upthread * pause-if-conflict, explicit resume needed Info passed to plugin * conflict type * relfilenode * latestRemovedXid -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com