Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2010-05-04T14:42:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:49 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > The only difference is that max_standby_delay is measured from log > timestamp. Perhaps it should work from WAL receipt timestamp rather than > from log timestamp? That would make some of the problems go away without > significantly changing the definition. I'll look at that. Patch to implement this idea posted in response to OT, upthread, so I can respond to the original complaints directly. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com