Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2010-05-04T14:42:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:49 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:

> The only difference is that max_standby_delay is measured from log
> timestamp. Perhaps it should work from WAL receipt timestamp rather than
> from log timestamp? That would make some of the problems go away without
> significantly changing the definition. I'll look at that.

Patch to implement this idea posted in response to OT, upthread, so I
can respond to the original complaints directly.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com