Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 20:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 18:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Huh?  How is a filter as coarse as an oldest-running-XID filter going
> >> to prevent that?  And aren't we initializing from trustworthy data in
> >> ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo, anyway?
> >> 
> >> I still say it's useless.
> 
> > Quite possibly. Your looking at other code outside of this patch. I'm
> > happy that you do so, but is it immediately related? I can have another
> > look when we finish this.
> 
> Well, it's nearby anyway.  I've committed the present patch (with a
> number of fixes).  While I was looking at it I came across several
> things in the existing code that I think are either wrong or at least
> inadequately documented --- the above complaint is just the tip of the
> iceberg.  I'm going to make another pass over it to see if I'm just
> missing things, and then report back.

Thank you for your input and changes.

You're welcome to share my iceberg.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com