Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> It looks like %replace_line expects all its elements to have one space
> between each token, still this is not enforced with a check across its
> hardcoded elements?

Yeah, I was wondering about that.  I wouldn't do it exactly like
that, but with a check that the entry gets matched somewhere.
The other patchset adds cross-checks that each ecpg.addons entry is
used exactly once, but there's no such check for these arrays that
are internal to parse.pl.  Can't quite decide if it's worth adding.

I debugged the patch in this thread by checking that the emitted
preproc.y didn't change, but that might not be helpful for changes
that are actually intended to change the grammar.

			regards, tom lane