Re: plpython3

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, James William Pye <lists@jwp.name>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, jd@commandprompt.com, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-02-01T20:35:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On mån, 2010-02-01 at 12:01 -0800, Nathan Boley wrote:
> I code nearly exclusively in python and C, but I have
> often found pl/python to be very unwieldy.  For this reason I often
> use pl/perl or pl/pgsql for problems that, outside of postgres, I
> would always use python.

I find that curious, because much of the criticism about the current
PL/Python can be traced back to the fact that the implementation used to
be an exact copy of PL/Perl.