Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:01 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:

> Putting it back takes time and
> given enough of that rare cloth, it will eventually be put back.

Looks like I'll have time to add the starts-at-shutdown-checkpoint item
back in after all.

I'd appreciate it if you could review the relation-specific conflict
patch, 'cos it's still important.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com